Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

This website is intended for healthcare professionals in KSA and UAE only.

The content provided is developed in accordance with local regulations and may not be applicable or compliant in other regions.

This website is intended for healthcare professionals in KSA and UAE only.
 The content provided is developed in accordance with local regulations and may not be applicable or compliant in other regions.

Icon Search
hamburguer menu

Search results

hamburguer menu
Submitted by Site Factory admin on
default
2014

RTX is more effective than AZA for maintenance of remission, but GC use and relapse remain common7-10

  • RTX was shown to be a more effective maintenance therapy than AZA for newly diagnosed AAV patients
  • Minor and major relapses occurred throughout the maintenance phase of treatment. By Month 28, 17% of patients suffered a major relapse, increasing to 38% by Month 60.
  • GC use remained common amongst all patients throughout the 60-month follow-up period